Worm Breeder's Gazette 9(3): 40

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

The Endpoints of Spontaneous unc-54 Deletions are not Associated with Substantial Direct Repeats

R. Pulak and P. Anderson

Figure 1

Figure 2

While studying the gene structures of spontaneous mutations 
affecting the unc-54 gene, we have identified a substantial collection 
of spontaneous deletions. We have cloned and sequenced the novel 
junctions of 13 of these mutations. Our goal is to determine if the 
mechanism of spontaneous deletion mutagenesis in eukaryotes is similar 
to that in prokaryotes. Spontaneous deletions in prokaryotes usually 
have endpoints within sequences which, in the wild-type gene, are 
short (5-10 bp) direct repeats; one of the repeats remains at the 
novel junction. The homology that these sequence repeats provides is 
important for formation of the deletions; such deletions occur at much 
lower frequencies in recA strains. We find that, unlike bacteria, 
sequence repeats are not a consistent feature of the unc-54 deletion 
breakpoints. The table below summarizes the location and sequences of 
unc-54 deletions. The base coordinates are those of Karn et al. [PNAS 
80:4253(1983)].
{Figure 1}
With one exception, each of the deletions is simple, in that a 
contiguous block of nucleotides is missing. No unexpected sequences 
are present at the novel junctions, nor are there any rearrangements 
at or near the termini. The one exception (r102-B) contains 
approximately 20 bp. of unexpected DNA inserted at the novel junction. 
The inserted DNA is derived from a nearby region of the unc-54 gene (
the region around base 5160). The source of the inserted material is 
not deleted in r102; thus, the insert represents a displaced 
duplication.
The number and sizes of direct repeats is close to that expected for 
deletions having completely random endpoints. The probability of 
direct repeats occurring purely by chance can be calculated from the 
known base composition of unc-54. The table below compares our 
observed frequency distribution to that expected for random endpoints 
of twelve deletions.
{Figure 2}
The wild-type sequence of unc-54 contains a very large number of 
direct repeats. For example, there are over 150 pairs of 9 bp. direct 
repeats in unc-54. Deletion of the material between these repeats 
would generate an unc-54 mutation that we would surely have detected 
in our screens. Yet, the largest direct repeat among our deletion 
endpoints is four base pairs. We conclude that direct repeats do not 
contribute to spontaneous C. s in a manner 
analogous to that of prokaryotes. We have been unable to identify any 
consistent feature of the deletion breakpoints. We have looked for 
breakpoint consensus sequences, nearby palindromes, stem-loop 
structures, dinucleotide and trinucleotide frequencies, Tc1 insertion 
sites, topoisomerase I and II cleavage sites, Z-DNA potential, and 
sequences related to the deletion associated sequence of Dibb et al. 
[J.Mol.Biol. 183:543 (1985)]. The only consistent feature of our 
deletions is that they tend to be short (average size about 400 bp.).
We have sequenced one spontaneous mutation that is not a deletion. 
unc-54(r274) is a G-->T transversion at nucleotide 4401, generating a 
UGA nonsense codon.

Figure 1

Figure 2