Worm Breeder's Gazette 8(2): 19

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

Selection of Hypodermal and Neuroblast Fates During the Development of the Lateral Hypodermis

C. Kenyon, E. Hedgecock

Figure 1

lin-32 appears to function in a switch between certain hypodermal 
and neuronal cell fates.  The recessive lin-32(e1926)X mutation 
transforms the Q, postdeirid or ray neuroblasts into specific 
hypodermal (seam/syncytial) cells (see CSH C.  elegans Meeting 
Abstracts, 1983).  Each neuroblast adopts a hypodermal fate normally 
assumed by cells with similar lineage histories.  V5.pa (postdeirid 
neuroblast) becomes a seam cell; as does its sister and its Vn.pa 
lineal analogues.  Each Rn.a cell (ray neuroblast) produces an 
anterior daughter that fuses with the hyp-7 syncytium, and a posterior 
daughter that assumes the fate of its aunt (R1-R5: tail seam cells; R6-
R9: hyp-7 nuclei).  Q usually fuses with hyp-7, but at a lower 
frequency it divides to produce two hyp-7 daughters, or becomes a seam 
cell.  e1926 does not appear to alter the H2.aa and T.p neurons and 
support cells.
We have isolated a (recessive) deficiency, eDf17, that fails to 
complement lin-32(e1926).  In e1926/eDf17 animals, postembryonic 
development resembles that of e1926 homozygotes, although Q more 
frequently becomes a seam.  In addition, a second, embryonic, 
phenotype (this Newsletter) is more frequently expressed.  These 
findings suggest that e1926 reduces but does not eliminate gene 
activity.
The phenotype of animals with reduced lin-32 levels indicates that 
three types of controls operate to specify the fates of these lateral 
hypodermal cells.  When lin-32 levels are low, one control system 
specifies alternative hypodermal cell fates.  A second system, 
involving lin-32, creates 'neuroblast slots'.  A third type determines 
whether these neuroblasts adopt Q, postdeirid, or ray fates.  We wish 
to understand how the system that specifies hypodermal cell fates is 
related to the system that specifies neuronal cell fates.  To what 
extent are they independent of one another?
The mechanisms that specify particular neuroblast and hypodermal 
cell fates must differ by more than simply lin-32 activity.  When lin-
32 levels are low in otherwise wild type animals or in lin-28(n719) 
mutants.  V5.pa and often Q become seam cells.  However, if lin-32 
functions, these cells can adopt any of three different neuroblast 
fates.  In the wild type, Q becomes a Q neuroblast and V5.pa becomes a 
postdeirid.  In lin-28(n719) animals, V5.pa becomes a ray.  [lin28(
n719) was isolated and characterized by Victor Ambros; see Newsletter. 
Vol. 7 no. 
2]
These observations also indicate that the instructions that dictate 
a particular cell's neuroblast fate when lin-32 is active can be 
changed without changing the instructions that dictate its hypodermal 
fate when lin-32 levels are low.  The heterochronic lin-28(n719) 
mutation mentioned above shifts the neuroblast fate of V5.pa from 
postdeirid to ray, but it does not alter the hypodermal fate 
associated with V5.pa in lin-32 animals.  If the hypodermal fate that 
normally underlies the ray were also shifted into the V5.pa lineal 
position, then in lin- 28(n719);lin-32(e1926) animals, V5.pa should 
have generated only hyp-7 syncytial and possibly tail seam cells.
In addition to the neuroblast transformation, lin-28(n719) also 
causes the precocious expression of S3 hypodermal lineage sequences (
those normally expressed in the L3) during the L2.  V(1-4).p and often 
V5.p divide once to produce seam and hyp-7 daughters, as in the wild 
type L3.  This suggests a simple explanation for the apparent sexual 
transformation in lin-28 mutants.  The decisions determining (i) 
hypodermal cell fates.  (ii) the lin-32-dependent creation of a 
neuroblast slot.  and (iii) neuroblast fates may each be stage 
specific and under the control of certain heterochronic genes.  We 
propose that in either sex, any lin-32-derived S1 neuroblasts will 
adopt O fates, S2 neuroblasts will become postdeirids, and S3/4 
neuroblasts will become rays.  Wild type hermaphrodites may lack rays 
simply because lin-32 levels are low during L3/4, and no such 
neuroblast is generated.  Rays in lin-28(n719) hermaphrodites may 
result from incomplete heterochronic transformations that shift the 
S3/4 neuroblast program but fail to block the creation of the S2 V5.pa 
neuroblast slot.
[see Figure 1]

Figure 1