Worm Breeder's Gazette 16(2): 48

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

Genetic markers in Oscheius / Dolichorhabditis sp. CEW1: why so many X-linked Uncs?

M.-L. Dichtel1, M.-A. Félix1, P.W. Sternberg2

1 Institut J. Monod, Paris, France
2 Caltech, Pasadena, USA

Oscheius / Dolichorhabditis sp. CEW1 and Pristionchus pacificus (R. Sommer lab) have been chosen to study the evolution of vulva formation in comparison to Caenorhabditis elegans. We have performed in Oscheius sp. CEW1 a random F2 screen for Egl and marker mutations (EMS mutagenesis of approx. 50,000 gametes).

The range of morphological markers isolated is similar to C. elegans: Unc (Kinker, Twitcher, Sluggish and Coilers), Dpy, Rol, Lon, as well as 2 Him (1 recessive, 1 dominant). Complementations and linkage analysis are under progress; 5 autosomal linkage groups have been defined to date but we do not know whether they represent 5 chromosomes. Some of the mutations presented here are allelic (for example the 4 Twitchers).

 

C. elegans (1)

Oscheius sp. CEW1

P. pacificus (2)

A

X

%

A

X

%

A

X

%

Dpy

79

29

27%

22

1

4%

24

0

0%

Unc

212

100

32%

18

26

59%

21

2

9%

Rol

4

1

-

0

5

-

1

0

-

Lon

5

5

-

1

1

-

0

0

-

Total

300

135

31%

41

33

45%

45

2

5%


Table 1: Phenotypes and autosomal versus X-linked localisation of the markers. A: autosomal markers. X: sex-linked markers. %: sex-linked markers/total.


Oscheius, like C. elegans and Pristionchus (2), is hermaphroditic with spontaneous males, appears to have a XX/XO sex determination (as judged from genetic data) and 6 chromosomes (as judged by Hoechst staining of oocytes). In C. elegans (1), 31 % of the markers are located on the X chromosome, which only represents 18% of the physical genome and 14% of the genes (3). In Oscheius, 45 % of the markers are located on the X chromosome. Conversely, in P. pacificus, almost all isolated markers are located on autosomes (2). We wonder whether the efficiency of mutagenesis is X- and species-specific.

Strangely, this excess of X-linked markers is very unequally shared between Dpys and Uncs in Oscheius (but not in C. elegans). The Dpys are mainly located on autosomes, but 59 % of the Uncs are X-linked (we do not know how many are allelic). We do not understand this strange bias. Maybe there are some mutational hotspots in Oscheius on X-linked unc genes; or many unc genes on theX chromosome.