Worm Breeder's Gazette 12(1): 49 (September 1, 1991)
These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.
Further investigation makes this suggestion less plausible. First, the four strong alleles of tra-3 are not equally suppressed by smg mutations. At 20°C, all have mean self-progeny broods of less than 1. In the presence of smg-2 ( e2008 ),the broods are larger but significantly different for each allele:
[See Figure 1]
Therefore, in one sense Smg suppression of tra-3 does show allele-specificity. Second, the nature of the tra-3 gene product, which appears to be a protease (see article by Tom Barnes, this WBG issue), makes it unlikely that there is any direct connection between the action of smg genes and the action of tra-3 .
Instead, it is more likely that the smg mutations act by stabilizing tra-3 messages containing chain-terminating mutations, as in the case of unc-54 (reported by Pulak & Anderson, 1991 Meeting Abstracts). Three of the tra-3 alleles are ambers and the fourth, e1767 ,could well be a UAA or UGA stop. It is unlikely that all of these mutations lead to nonsense peptides with partial activity. In particular, Tom Barnes has found that the e1903 amber mutation is located at the putative active site of the tra-3 'protease', so the nonsense fragment generated by translation of e1903 message should have zero activity, and elevating the amount of such a fragment would not restore activity. However, very low-level read-through of the UAG codon might supply traces of full-length product. It is clear that the tra-3 product is required only in minute quantities, so smg-stabilization of nonsense messages might increase the synthesis of full-length tra-3 product to a level at which partial activity would be seen. The same explanation (stabilization plus read-through) has been proposed for the smg-suppressible allele of lin-29 , n546 ,which is also a nonsense (UGA) mutation (Rougvie & Ambros, WBG 11-3: 37).
Endogenous read-through might also explain why these tra-3 mutants are distinctly less masculinized at low temperature. Bob Waterston's studies of sup-5 and sup-7 showed that amber suppression is more efficient at low temperature, and this might also be true of read-through.