Worm Breeder's Gazette 11(3): 61

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

mab-5 and mig-1 are Required for the Same Phases of the Posterior Migration of QL

Naomi Tamar Robinson, Joshua Niclas and Cynthia Kenyon

Figure 1

The Q cells are migratory neuroblasts located initially between V4 
and V5.  They are fascinating cells because they migrate in opposite 
directions: QR (on the right) and its descendants migrate anteriorly 
whereas QL and one of its descendants migrate posteriorly (see Figure).
Thus, by studying mutations that affect Q migration, it may be 
possible to identify genes involved in distinguishing left from right 
and anterior from posterior as well as genes involved in the process 
of cell migration itself.  We have begun to analyze two genes that 
affect Q cell migration, mab-5 and mig-1.mab-5 encodes a homeodomain 
protein required for many posterior cell types to develop correctly.  
In particular, it is required for QL to migrate posteriorly.  Mosaic 
analysis suggests that mab-5 is required in a cell-autonomous fashion 
for Q cell migration (see Kenyon, Cell 46, 477), and not in the cells 
that contact QL as it migrates (with the possible exception of V5L, 
sister of QL).
M.  Chalfie (1983) found that in mab-5(e1239) mutants, QL migrates 
posteriorly as in wild type but its two daughter cells reverse 
direction and migrate anteriorly.  We have followed Q migration in 
animals carrying a putative gain-of-function allele of mab-5 
originally isolated and characterized by E.  Hedgecock (molecular 
analysis of this allele will be reported in a future WBG article by 
Salser and Kenyon).  In this mab-5(gf) mutant, e1751, descendants of 
both QL and QR (AVM/PVM and SDQL/R neurons) are located in the 
posterior (Hedgecock, pers.  comm.).  We followed the migration of QR 
in one mab-5(gf); 90) animal and observed that, 
again, the initial phase of migration was normal (QR migrated 
anteriorly) but that the forward migration stopped after the first 
cell division.  After additional cell division, QR.ap migrated back 
toward the tail.  From these observations, it seems that control of QL 
migration is complicated and has several distinct phases.  The initial 
phase of QL migration, prior to division, does not require mab-5; 
therefore, at least initially, mab-5 is not required for 
distinguishing left from right.  Instead, mab-5 seems to have two 
functions in Q migration.  First, it appears to prevent the daughters 
of QL from migrating anteriorly.  Later, mab-5 seems to cause QL.ap to 
migrate posteriorly into the tail region instead of anteriorly to the 
head.
The mig-1 gene, which is also required for correct Q cell migration, 
was identified independently by Hedgecock (1987) and Desai (1988).  In 
mig-1(e1787) mutants, descendants of both QL and QR (AVM/PVM and 
SDQR/L) are located in the anterior body region (10/20 SDQL and PVM 
cells).  We followed QL migration in mig-1(e1787) and found that the 
QL migration pattern resembles that of loss-of-function mab-5 mutants (
2/2); that is, QL migrates posteriorly but its daughters reverse 
direction and migrate anteriorly.  Therefore, it seems probable that 
mab-5 and mig-1 are required for the same phases of the migration of 
QL descendants.
We were interested in learning whether the Mig-1 phenotype could be 
suppressed by the mab-5(gf) mutation.  Therefore, mig-1(e1787);mab-5(
e1751) double mutants were constructed.  In these animals, mab-5(gf) 
suppresses mig-1 completely: QL descendants PVM and SDQL retain their 
wild type posterior positions (20/20), and QR descendant AVM and SDQR 
are also located posteriorly (21/22).  The QR migration pattern was 
identical in mab-5(gf) and mig-1,mab-5(gf) animals (2/2).
The most straightforward interpretation of this result is that the 
mig-1 product acts upstream of mab-5 to activate mab-5 in the 
daughters of QL.  However, mig-1 could act downstream of mab-5 if mig-
1(e1787) is not null, and the mab-5(gf) mutation enhances residual mig-
1 activity.  Alternatively, mig-1 and mab-5 could act independently to 
promote posterior migration, and the mab-5(gf) product could allow the 
cell to bypass the requirement for the mig-1 product.  Information 
about the mig-1 null phenotype and mab-5 expression patterns in mig-1 
mutants will help distinguish between these possibilities.
[See Figure 1]

Figure 1