Worm Breeder's Gazette 11(3): 24

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

Molecular Cloning of let-60

Min Han, Hiro Mori and Paul Sternberg

Figure 1

We previously summarized the genetic characterization of the 
function of let-60 in vulval induction (WBG 11(2): 105).  Our data 
suggested that the level of let-60 activity controls the fates of the 
vulval precursor cells (VPCs) in response to the inductive signal from 
the gonadal anchor cell.  Reduction of the activity of the gene causes 
a vulvaless (Vul) phenotype.  We also argued that an increase of let-
60 activity (resulting from lin-34 mutations) causes a multivulva (Muv)
phenotype.  Moreover, let-60 acts after let-23 and lin-15, but before 
lin-1 and lin-12 in the genetic pathway of vulval cell type 
determination.
We have carried out following experiments towards the goal of 
cloning let-60: (1).  Determination of the left breakpoint of nDf27.  
let-60 maps between the left breakpoint of nDf27 and dpy-20 (see 
Figure 1).  We located the breakpoint within the cosmids F58B3 and 
C50G2.  
(2).  Chromosome walk by computer.  We tried to find the two gaps 
between dpy-20 and the left breakpoint of nDf27 (Figure 1).  Cosmid 
D1035 was the best candidate for the walk towards the left of dpy-20.  
We had a hard time isolating the intact cosmid from bacteria because 
of recombination.  However, when we finally isolated the cosmid out of 
the original stock kindly provided by Alan Coulson and John Sulston, 
we found that the left half of the cosmid (three different fragments) 
hybridized with every colony of a genomic library.  These results 
suggested that the left half of the cosmid is bacterial DNA.  When 
Alan Coulson removed D1035 from the physical map, the computer 
rearranged the area and the gaps disappeared (compare the two figures).
In addition, when we walked with another cosmid, ZK205, we were able 
to fish out new cosmids extending into the 'gaps' easily, suggesting 
that gaps in the area were unlikely.  
(3).  RFLP mapping the let-60(lin-34) mutations.  We have made 
genomic DNA from more than 20 EMS-generated mutants of let-60 or lin-
34 (some were provided by G.  Beitel and S.  Clark in R.  Horvitz's 
laboratory).  We detected no RFLPs by Southern analysis with more than 
8 different restriction enzymes.  
(4).  Transformation by microinjection.  Mainly using the method 
reported by Mello et al.  (WBG 11(1): 18-19), we have successfully 
suppressed the Let and Vul phenotypes by injecting cosmid DNAs into 
strains with dominant negative or putative null alleles of let-60.  
The results are shown in Figure 2.  Strikingly, strains carrying the 
cosmids which complement the mutant phenotypes (about 20-50 copies per 
genome) often show a partial Muv phenotype.  We interpret the Muv 
phenotype as resulting from additional copies of the let-60 gene.  
This result is thus consistent with our genetic argument that a high 
level of the let-60 activity specifies the vulval fates of VPCs.
Further molecular analysis of the gene is in progress.
[See Figure 1]

Figure 1