Worm Breeder's Gazette 11(2): 76

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

What Marks a Transcript for Trans-splicing? An in vivo Test

Rick Conrad, Jeffrey Thomas, John Spieth and Tom Blumenthal

In C.  elegans some transcripts receive a 22 base spliced leader (SL)
from the SL snRNP by trans-splicing, while others do not.  We are 
interested in the question of what property of the recipient 
transcripts marks them for trans-splicing.  We are testing the simple 
idea that the presence of a splice acceptor and branch site, with no 
donor site upstream, is the signal for trans-splicing.  The recent 
discovery that some RNAs receive SL1 while others receive SL2, however,
suggests that this simple hypothesis cannot be the whole story.  
There must also be a specificity determinant.
In order to test the idea, we created a modified vit gene (normally 
not trans-spliced).  We engineered an almost-complete intron from vit-
5 into our standard vit-2/vit-6 fusion gene (J.  Spieth et.  al., 1988,
Dev.  Biol.  130, 285 ).  The 11 nucleotide stretch of 5' 
untranslated RNA normally found in this gene was converted to a 95 
nucleotide region containing a vit-5 intron lacking only the 5' splice-
donor site.  Two stable transgenic strains containing this gene, both 
of which express the fusion protein, were selected.  The transgene is 
transcribed exclusively in the adult hermaphrodite intestine but in 
low amounts.  Both strains are viable only as heterozygotes for the 
fusion gene and produce very small broods.
We have successfully performed two types of experiments with the 
small amount of RNA we have been able to obtain from these two strains.
The results of both experiments support the idea that the fusion 
message is trans-spliced to SL1.  In the first experiment, we 
performed primer extension with an oligonucleotide capable of 
hybridizing to either the endogenous vit-2 mRNA or the fusion mRNA.  
Primer extension products were found corresponding to the expected 
lengths of the former (a very intense band) and of the predicted trans-
spliced product (a very weak band).  The latter band was generated 
only from RNA preparations made from the two transgenic strains 
carrying the modified vit fusion gene.  In the second experiment we 
amplified reverse transcription products of the fusion mRNA using PCR. 
A downstream oligonucleotide, complementary to vit-2 mRNA, was the 
primer extended in the reverse transcription step.  Three different 
upstream oligonucleotides were used: oligo A corresponds to the 5' end 
of the initial transcript of the modified fusion gene; oligo SL1 
corresponds to the SL1 sequence; and oligo SL2 corresponds to the SL2 
sequence.  The PCR products were probed with an oligonucleotide 
complementary to a region of vit-2 between the primers.  With oligo A, 
the PCR product was not dependent on the reverse transcription step 
and so was probably due to DNA contamination.  With oligo SL1, an 
intense band of the size predicted for the trans-spliced mRNA was seen 
only with RNA isolated from transgenic lines containing the modified 
fusion gene.  A much weaker band was seen with oligo SL2, which may be 
due to a small amount of trans-splicing to SL2, but could also result 
entirely from cross-hybridization of the oligo SL2 with the SL1 
sequence.
Vit-2 mRNA is not normally trans-spliced.  The fact that addition of 
most of an intron into its 5' untranslated region results in trans-
splicing indicates that this DNA contains the information to specify 
trans-splicing to SL1.  The simplest explanation is that SL1 splicing 
represents a default mode for splice-acceptor sites which have no 
upstream splice-donor, and that SL2 splicing may require a more 
specific signal.  However, we have not eliminated the possibility that 
the vit-5 intron sequences inserted in the modified fusion gene 
coincidentally harbor the information for an SL1-specific splice.