Worm Breeder's Gazette 11(2): 106

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

unc-101 Mutations, Which Suppress the Vulvaless Phenotype of let-23, may be Recessive Hypermorphs

Gregg Jongeward and Paul Sternberg

Figure 1

In screening 75,000 F1 mutagenized haploid chromosome sets for 
suppressors of the vulvaless (Vul) phenotype of non-null let-23 
alleles, we recovered two alleles, sy108 and sy161, which fail to 
complement unc-101(m1).  Both of these new alleles suppress the vulval 
defect of let-23(sy1), a Vul non lethal allele, as do m1 and rh6, the 
previously identified alleles.  The lethality of the subviable let-23 
allele sy97 is not suppressed.  Homozygotes of all four alleles 
segregate some dead larvae (primarily L1, but dead eggs, L2s, L3s, L4s,
and young adults can be found).  This lethality can be rescued by 
zygotic or maternal expression (no dead larvae are present among the 
cross progeny if sy108 hermaphrodites are mated to N2 males) in the 
case of sy108.  We have not yet tested to determine if this is true 
for all alleles.  Additional pleiotrophies are seen in the amphids and 
phasmids (Hall and Hedgecock WBG11.1), defecation cycle (J.  Thomas, 
in press) and male spicules (H.  Chamberlin, pers.  comm).  We are 
attempting to determine a null phenotype for unc-101.  In a non-
complementation screen of 17,000 F1 cross progeny hermaphrodites, two 
new alleles, sy168 and sy169, have been recovered.  These alleles are 
similar to the other four alleles.  We have mapped unc-101 to the 
right of let-201, 202, and 203 and to the left of unc-59.  Thus, unc-
101 should be deleted by eDf3, which fails to complement the lethals 
and unc-59.  Animals of genotype unc-101(sy108)/eDf3 are both viable 
and coordinated.  Similarly, sDp1 should cover unc-101 and complement 
the phenotype in an animal of the genotype sDp1/unc-101/unc-101.  
However, animals of this genotype [sDp1/dpy-5 unc-101(m1)/dpy-5 
1)] are uncoordinated.  We have two explanations 
for this observation, both of which are hard to swallow: (1) either 
unc-101 mutations are recessive hypermorphs or (2) unc-101 is near or 
is itself a haplo lethal, triplo lethal locus (i.e.  a locus that is 
viable if and only if it is diploid).  We are attempting to 
distinguish between these two possibilities.  If the existing unc-101 
mutations are gain-of-function and unc/Df is wild type and viable, 
then null alleles should be recoverable as F1 suppressors of the Unc 
phenotype.  To date, we have screened 18,000 EMS mutagenized F1 
chromosome sets and have not recovered any candidates; we are 
currently screening X-ray mutagenized animals for F1 revertants.  On 
the other hand, if unc-101 is or is near a haplo triplo lethal, then 
eDf3 is actually a complex deficiency and it should be possible to 
recover new unc-101 alleles on the eDf3 chromosome in a non-
complementation screen.
[See Figure 1]

Figure 1