Worm Breeder's Gazette 10(3): 42

These abstracts should not be cited in bibliographies. Material contained herein should be treated as personal communication and should be cited as such only with the consent of the author.

unc-86 has Extended Homology to Mammalian Transcription Factors

Michael Finney and Gary Ruvkun

Figure 1

Figure 2

We have completed the sequence of unc-86, a gene that controls 
certain cell lineages (Chalfie et al., Cell 24, 59,1981) and cell 
differentiations (Finney and Horvitz, WBG 7(2), 45) in C.  elegans.  
We inferred a transcript from the genomic sequence and confirmed some 
of the splicing patterns with RNase protection experiments.  unc-86 
encodes a protein with extensive sequence similarity to three 
mammalian transcription factors: Pit-1, a rat pituitary transcription 
factor (Ingraham et al., Cell, in press), Oct-1, a ubiquitously-
expressed human transcription factor (Strum and Herr, Genes and 
Development, in press), and Oct-2, a human B cell-specific 
transcription factor (Clerc et al., Genes and Development, in press).  
This observation suggests that the unc-86 protein is also a 
transcription factor.
The homologous region, referred to as the pou (pit oct unc, 
pronounced 'pow') domain, consists of three parts: two 33 amino acid 
regions, A and B, followed by a 60 amino acid homeodomain (see Figure 
1).  The homeodomains of the four pou proteins are more similar to 
each other than they are to other known homeodomains.  The four pou 
homeodomains have several features in common, including similar 
sequences in the 'helix 3' region (Laughon and Scott, Nature 310, 25,
1984;) (Figure 2).  The A and B regions of the pou domain are even 
more highly conserved among the four proteins than is the homeodomain. 
The A and B regions and this new class of homeodomain have been found 
only in these four proteins, always in the order A-B-homeodomain, and 
with only short sequences between the regions.  This similarity among 
proteins from different animal phyla suggests that the three regions 
might function as a unit.  There is mounting evidence that 
homeodomains bind DNA; it is possible that the pou domain may act as a 
functional unit in DNA binding.  It seems likely that the pou domain 
determines the sequence specificity of DNA binding: Oct-1 and Oct-2 
are almost completely identical within the pou domain but are 
different outside it, and they bind to the same DNA sequence.  The 
residues that are conserved in the pou domains of Pit-1 and the Oct 
proteins probably largely define this specificity, since those 
proteins have similar binding specificities.  These considerations 
suggest that the unc-86 protein may also be similar in its DNA binding 
specificity.
All of the pou proteins presumably interact with other genes to 
function.  Genetic studies of unc-86 offer an approach to the 
identification of interacting genes.  So far, unc-86 function has been 
analyzed in two genetic pathways: one that generates the touch 
receptor neurons and one that generates the HSN neurons.
In the touch receptor pathway, unc-86 functions to specify cell 
lineage and cell fate.  unc-86 controls the fate of an ancestor of 
each touch receptor cell.  Acting downstream of unc-86 is the gene mec-
3, which controls the fate of the touch receptor cells and which also 
contains a homeodomain (Way and Chalfie, Cell 54, 5,1988).  It is 
possible that the unc-86 protein directly regulates mec-3 gene 
expression.  In this case, the mec-3 gene would be expected to contain 
binding sites for the unc-86 protein.  We searched the mec-3 sequence 
for possible Pit-1 and Oct-1/Oct-2 binding sites.  We found a 
potential Pit-1 binding site within an intron near the probable 5' end 
of the mec-3 gene and a potential Oct-1/Oct-2 binding site upstream of 
the probable start of the gene.  We do not know if either of these 
sites is significant.
In the HSN pathway unc-86 is necessary for the maturation of that 
neuron in the L4 stage.  Two genes that act upstream of unc-86, 
control all aspects of HSN 
phenotype and could be regulators of unc-86 activity in this cell.  
Two other genes, egl-45 and sem-4, also act at the step of HSN 
maturation; like unc-86, tropic, and not only 
controls HSN maturation but also specifies other cell fates (C.  Desai,
G.  Garriga, 5.  McIntire, and H.R.  Horvitz, manuscript in 
preparation; M.  Stem, personal communication).  The egl-45 and sem-4 
products might act together with the unc-86 protein to regulate 
downstream genes.  Finally, 16 genes necessary for aspects of HSN 
differentiation have been identified that act downstream of unc-86; 
these genes could be transcriptionally regulated by unc-86.In either 
pathway, it is a reasonable guess that unc-86 may regulate its own 
expression.  We have found a potential Pit-1 binding site in the first 
intron of unc-86.  We do not have enough sequence upstream of the gene 
to know if there are additional 5' sites.  unc-86 was identified 
genetically, based on its effects on cell fate and cell 
differentiation.  Pit-1, Oct-1, and Oct-2 were identified 
biochemically as transcription factors.  These two very different 
approaches have identified proteins that share an extensive common 
domain.  Not only does this convergence indicate a biochemical 
function for some of the genes involved in development, but it also 
suggests that transcription factors studied biochemically might be 
involved in the specification of cell type.
[See Figure 1 & 2]

Figure 1

Figure 2